Volume I: Institutional Failure and the Twilight of the Giant

Part III: The Actor and the Placebo — The Historical Positioning of the Trump Phenomenon

Chapter 28: The Victims of Globalization: The Forgotten Class — The Economic Foundation of Trump’s Populism


This chapter will provide an in-depth analysis from the perspectives of economic geography and social class, focusing on the economic despair experienced by America’s “Rust Belt” and blue-collar class. This despair constitutes the most fertile soil and solid foundation upon which Trump-style populism thrives, and serves as a concrete elaboration of Part One (Chapter Six: Economic Imbalance).

First Thesis: The Transformation of Economic Structure and the Formation of the “Rust Belt”

I. From “Manufacturing Giant” to “Rust Belt”

Since the mid-20th century, the United States has undergone a dramatic economic structural transformation, shifting from a manufacturing-dominated nation to one dominated by services and finance.

The Afterglow of “Roosevelt’s Autumn”: In the decades following World War II, the Midwest and Great Lakes region (the later Rust Belt) served as the backbone of American industry, providing high-wage, union-protected, “American Dream” jobs that did not require college degrees. These jobs were the engine of social mobility.

The Impact of Globalization: Beginning in the 1980s, with the signing of free trade agreements and the global outsourcing of manufacturing, these high-wage jobs began to flow massively to lower-cost countries. This impact was not a gentle transition but an “economic retreat” that devastated entire industrial regions.

II. Geographic Trauma: The Collapse of Communities

The naming of the “Rust Belt” (referring to factories left to rust after closure) is not merely an economic term but a description of the spiritual trauma inflicted on these lands and people:

The Disintegration of Communities: When factories closed, what was lost was not just jobs but the entire economic and social structure of communities. Local government tax revenues dried up, schools and public services declined, families fractured, and crises of drugs and opioids spread.

“A Sense of Spatial Abandonment”: Residents of these regions felt completely abandoned—spatially and spiritually—by the financial elites in Washington and New York. Their suffering was ignored by mainstream media and political elites.

Second Thesis: The Forgotten Class: Blue-Collar Despair and the Culture Wars

III. The Psychological and Social Consequences of Economic Despair

The economic despair experienced by the blue-collar class manifested not only in stagnant wages but also in deep psychological and social trauma:

The Loss of Dignity: For many traditional blue-collar workers, what they lost was not just income but the dignity of masculinity, of being a family provider, of their social role. This loss of dignity was a more powerful driver than poverty itself.

“Deaths of Despair”: Research shows that in these economically declining regions, mortality rates related to drugs, alcohol, and suicide rose significantly. This reflects a collective social psychology of hopelessness about the future.

The Educational Divide: Globalization’s demand for college degrees made blue-collar workers without higher education feel excluded from the new economic system. They began to view universities and “highly educated elites” as hostile cultural forces, intensifying the culture wars.

IV. The Intertwining of Culture and Economy: The Projection of Anger

On this soil of economic despair, Trump successfully transformed economic pain into cultural and political anger.

Targets of Hatred: His populism precisely attributed the economic plight of the blue-collar class to external enemies (free trade, China, illegal immigrants) and internal elites (Wall Street, the Washington Establishment, the media).

The Redefinition of Identity: Trump reframed the forgotten blue-collar worker as the “Real American,” whose suffering was the result of government betrayal. This gave this class a sense of recognition and empowerment—a powerful form of emotional mobilization.

Third Thesis: The Foundation of Trump’s Populism: Crude and Simple Solutions

V. The Rejection of “Establishment” Language

Traditional politicians (the Establishment) typically responded to the Rust Belt’s plight with complex economic terminology (“retraining,” “structural adjustment”). However, this language was perceived as empty and hypocritical.

Trump’s “Anti-Language”: Trump offered simple, crude, direct solutions: “Build the wall,” “Trade wars,” “Bring back jobs.” Though economists viewed these slogans as naive and destructive, for desperate voters they were powerful, understandable promises of action.

The Allure of Commitment: For a population that had been promised progress for decades yet felt betrayed, a controversial actor daring to promise “change” was more appealing than an Establishment figure saying “we need prudent, slow structural reform.”

VI. The Amplification of Institutional Flaws: The Precise Targeting of the Electoral College

The political success of Trump’s populism also lay in its precise exploitation of institutional flaws:

The Focus of the Electoral College: Several key Rust Belt states (such as Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) happened to be swing states under the Electoral College system (Chapter Sixteen). This gave the voice of this “forgotten class” disproportionately enormous weight in presidential elections.

The Irony of Institutions: The group most abandoned by the system gained the power to determine who became president. This was a profound historical irony.

VII. Chapter Conclusion: The Dance of Despair and the Actor

The economic despair of the Rust Belt and blue-collar class was the material foundation for the rise of the Trump phenomenon.

Trump’s historical positioning is this: he did not create this despair, but perfectly performed the role that this despair demanded. He transformed economic and cultural grievances into a “war of revenge” against Washington, Wall Street, and cultural elites. The goal of this war of revenge was not to repair the system, but to vent anger—forming a solid foundation for the core thesis of Part Three: “The Actor and the Placebo.”